Oerjan Moy
Assignment # 2:
analysis of an online crime
This past September, a
16 year old boy was arrested for spreading rumors over the Internet. The crime
involved posts that questioned if the police were doing a good job after a man
fell and died from the upper floor of a karaoke club. The post was written on a
popular messaging service and on a micro blog. The message was reposted 962
times and viewed thousands of times. This violated the new rumor regulations;
if someone is spreading a rumor on the internet the person could be punished if
it was reposted over 500 times or viewed more than 5,000 times. The boy was
arrested for “seriously disrupted social order” because the boy post caused a
few dozen unemployed people to gather at the scene of the death of the other
man and started to chant slogans. This was also leading to traffic chaos, and a
situation out of control.
The boy’s family has
now retained a lawyer and vows to vigorously defend their son.
I think that the
reason for the disinhibition was a “minization of status and authority”. When
people, in this example the 16 year old boy are online and often are anonymous,
it’s easier to say what they are thinking to an authority without consequences,
especially in China. When the authority is minimized it’s easier to use the
freedom of speech.
In this case the
freedom of speech become too big and got too much attention. At the beginning
when post was reposted under 500 times it wasn’t a crime. After the 500 it
began to be too big for the Chinese government, and they made it a crime. The
boy become a victim of a non-crime because the non-crime got too much attention
and become a crime.
Link to article: http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-china-arrest-rumors-internet-20130921,0,2831881.story
No comments:
Post a Comment